Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition vs GeForce 8200M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1478not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLWhistler
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)18 April 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8480
Core clock speed400 MHz598 MHz
Number of transistorsno data716 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data14.35
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5741 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data794 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data50.82 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 18 April 2011
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm

HD 6750M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G and Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition
Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 22 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G or Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.