P106-090 vs GeForce 8600M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8600M GS with P106-090, including specs and performance data.


8600M GS
2007
512 MB DDR2, 20 Watt
0.21

P106-090 outperforms 8600M GS by a whopping 2957% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1448623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.816.59
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG86GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2007 (18 years ago)31 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16768
Core clock speed450 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60073.49
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS2.352 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs848
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cache32 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.16.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8600M GS 0.21
P106-090 6.42
+2957%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600M GS 88
Samples: 313
P106-090 2720
+2991%
Samples: 19

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Valorant 24−27
−2900%
750−800
+2900%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Dota 2 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Valorant 24−27
−2900%
750−800
+2900%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Dota 2 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Valorant 24−27
−2900%
750−800
+2900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Valorant 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 6.42
Recency 1 May 2007 31 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

8600M GS has 275% lower power consumption.

P106-090, on the other hand, has a 2957% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GS is a notebook graphics card while P106-090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 71 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GS or P106-090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.