Arc A530M vs GeForce 8600M GS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8600M GS and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8600M GS
2007
512 MB DDR2, 20 Watt
0.23

Arc A530M outperforms 8600M GS by a whopping 7796% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1372308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.7919.26
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG86DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2007 (17 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161536
Core clock speed450 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors210 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600124.8
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs896
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8600M GS 0.23
Arc A530M 18.16
+7796%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600M GS 88
Arc A530M 6979
+7831%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1420%
75−80
+1420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−975%
40−45
+975%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−950%
60−65
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1420%
75−80
+1420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1983%
120−130
+1983%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−975%
40−45
+975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
World of Tanks 10−12
−1891%
210−220
+1891%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−950%
60−65
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1420%
75−80
+1420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1983%
120−130
+1983%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−16400%
160−170
+16400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
Valorant 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 50−55
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 14−16
−7567%
1150−1200
+7567%
Valorant 0−1 21−24

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A530M is 16400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 18.16
Recency 1 May 2007 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 65 Watt

8600M GS has 225% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 7795.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600M GS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
GeForce 8600M GS
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 14 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 201 vote

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.