RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 8600 GTS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8600 GTS with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

8600 GTS
2007, $199
256 MB GDDR3, 60 Watt
0.44

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 8600 GTS by a whopping 11902% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.5636.91
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG84AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores327424
Core clock speed675 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors289 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80386.3
Floating-point processing power0.0928 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cache32 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8600 GTS 0.44
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.81
+11902%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600 GTS 185
Samples: 654
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22085
+11838%
Samples: 390

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 52.81
Recency 17 April 2007 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 110 Watt

8600 GTS has 83.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11902.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600 GTS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8600 GTS is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8600 GTS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 226 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600 GTS or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.