GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs 8600 GTS
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1250 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.51 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | G84 | GB203 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 April 2007 (17 years ago) | 20 February 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $749 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 8960 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2452 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 289 million | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 10.80 | 686.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0928 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 128 |
| TMUs | 16 | 280 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 70 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | 304 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 16 GB |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 10.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 April 2007 | 20 February 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 300 Watt |
8600 GTS has 400% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600 GTS and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
