Tesla C1080 vs GeForce 8600 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG84GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16240
Core clock speed540 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors289 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32048.80
Floating-point processing power0.03808 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs880
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 188 Watt

8600 GS has 300% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1080, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600 GS and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600 GS is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C1080 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GS
GeForce 8600 GS
NVIDIA Tesla C1080
Tesla C1080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600 GS or Tesla C1080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.