Tesla C1080 vs GeForce 8400 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.24no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG86SGT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2008 (17 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16240
Core clock speed459 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate3.67248.80
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L2 Cache16 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2008 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 188 Watt

8400 SE has 276% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1080, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 SE and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 SE is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C1080 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE
NVIDIA Tesla C1080
Tesla C1080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 SE or Tesla C1080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.