ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v vs GeForce 845M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 845M and Mobility Radeon HD 550v, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 845M
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
3.96
+408%

845M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 550v by a whopping 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6961150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.235.35
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM108M96
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 August 2015 (9 years ago)5 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Core clock speed1071 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1176 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate37.6314.40
Floating-point processing power0.9032 TFLOPS0.288 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
+5%
20
−5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+38.7%
30−35
−38.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+38.7%
30−35
−38.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+38.7%
30−35
−38.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how GeForce 845M and ATI Mobility HD 550v compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 845M is 5% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 845M is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce 845M surpassed ATI Mobility HD 550v in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 0.78
Recency 26 August 2015 5 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce 845M has a 407.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 550v, on the other hand, has 350% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 845M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 550v in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GeForce 845M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v
Mobility Radeon HD 550v

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 23 votes

Rate GeForce 845M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 550v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.