RTX A4000H vs GeForce 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 840M with RTX A4000H, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 840M
2014
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
2.49

A4000H outperforms 840M by a whopping 973% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking848229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.0915.39
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM108GA104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2014 (11 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed1029 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98299.5
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache192 KB6 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 840M 2.49
RTX A4000H 26.72
+973%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 840M 1099
Samples: 4858
RTX A4000H 11815
+975%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45
−900%
450−500
+900%
Full HD18
−956%
190−200
+956%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Fortnite 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Valorant 40−45
−923%
450−500
+923%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 46
−878%
450−500
+878%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Dota 2 27−30
−937%
280−290
+937%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Fortnite 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−956%
95−100
+956%
Valorant 40−45
−923%
450−500
+923%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Dota 2 27−30
−937%
280−290
+937%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−900%
60−65
+900%
Valorant 40−45
−923%
450−500
+923%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−950%
210−220
+950%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%
Valorant 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%
Valorant 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

This is how GeForce 840M and RTX A4000H compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000H is 900% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4000H is 956% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.49 26.72
Recency 12 March 2014 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 140 Watt

GeForce 840M has 324.2% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000H, on the other hand, has a 973.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000H is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 840M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 840M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000H is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GeForce 840M
NVIDIA RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1048 votes

Rate GeForce 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4000H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 840M or RTX A4000H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.