Mobility Radeon HD 4870 vs GeForce 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce 840M
2014
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
2.82
+36.2%

GeForce 840M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4870 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking758834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.140.17
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameN15S-GTM98-XT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)9 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Current price$743 $305

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI Mobility HD 4870 has 21% better value for money than GeForce 840M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384800
Core clock speed1029 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data956 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.9822.00
Floating-point performance863.2 gflops880.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 840M and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz888 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s56.83 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 840M 2.82
+36.2%
ATI Mobility HD 4870 2.07

GeForce 840M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4870 by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 840M 7191
+8.4%
ATI Mobility HD 4870 6631

GeForce 840M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4870 by 8% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45
+50%
30−35
−50%
Full HD18
−38.9%
25
+38.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hitman 3 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hitman 3 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hitman 3 8−9 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 no data

This is how GeForce 840M and ATI Mobility HD 4870 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 840M is 50% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 4870 is 39% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.82 2.07
Recency 12 March 2014 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

The GeForce 840M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GeForce 840M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Mobility Radeon HD 4870

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 837 votes

Rate GeForce 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.