RTX A1000 vs GeForce 8400M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M GS with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

8400M GS
2007, $15
256 MB DDR2, 11 Watt
0.25

RTX A1000 outperforms 8400M GS by a whopping 10212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1429251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.7539.70
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG86GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)16 April 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
Core clock speed400 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1462 MHz
Number of transistors210 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200105.3
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs872
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cache16 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400M GS 0.25
RTX A1000 25.78
+10212%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M GS 100
Samples: 638
RTX A1000 10798
+10698%
Samples: 578

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−10100%
2550−2600
+10100%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−9900%
1300−1350
+9900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Dota 2 9−10
−9900%
900−950
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−9900%
500−550
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−10100%
2550−2600
+10100%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Dota 2 9−10
−9900%
900−950
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−9900%
500−550
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−10100%
2550−2600
+10100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−9900%
1400−1450
+9900%
Valorant 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−9900%
200−210
+9900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 25.78
Recency 9 May 2007 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 50 Watt

8400M GS has 355% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has a 10212% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 71 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GS or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.