Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 8400M GS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M GS with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

8400M GS
2007
256 MB DDR2, 11 Watt
0.25

Nvidia 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 8400M GS by a whopping 9232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1401251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8353.67
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG86AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed400 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors210 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200129.6
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache16 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9186%
650−700
+9186%
Valorant 24−27
−9131%
2400−2450
+9131%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−9131%
1200−1250
+9131%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Dota 2 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9186%
650−700
+9186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Valorant 24−27
−9131%
2400−2450
+9131%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Dota 2 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9186%
650−700
+9186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Valorant 24−27
−9131%
2400−2450
+9131%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8900%
1350−1400
+8900%
Valorant 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 23.33
Recency 9 May 2007 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 35 Watt

8400M GS has 218.2% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 9232% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 8400M GS
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 43 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 38 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GS or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.