Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs GeForce 8400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G 8200M G mGPU AMD 8200M G mGPU Intel 8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 8600M GT Mac Edition 8600M GT SLI 8700M GT 8700M GT SLI 8800M GTS 8800M GTX 8800M GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M G and Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8400M G
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.25

Steam Deck 8CU outperforms 8400M G by a whopping 3988% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
8400M G 8400M G
Steam Deck 8CU Steam Deck 8CU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1428485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.93no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG86RDNA 2 Sephiroth
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)9 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache16 KB1 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−128

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Valorant 24−27
−288%
95−100
+288%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1085%
150−160
+1085%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Valorant 24−27
−288%
95−100
+288%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Valorant 24−27
−288%
95−100
+288%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Steam Deck 8CU is 5400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Steam Deck 8CU performs better in 24 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (58%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.25 10.22
Recency 9 May 2007 9 November 2023
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm

Steam Deck 8CU has a 3988% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1233% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M G in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
8400M GS GeForce 8400M GS
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
HD 7290 Radeon HD 7290
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
8200M G mGPU 8200M G mGPU AMD
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 3070 Ti
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
RTX 3070 16 GB 3070 16 GB
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
Arc A380 A380
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
vs
ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X PRO AGP 2X
NVS 130M NVIDIA NVS 130M
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
NVS 130M NVIDIA NVS 130M
vs
GeForce MX250 MX250
NVS 130M NVIDIA NVS 130M
vs
RTX 8000 Passive 8000 Passive
NVS 130M NVIDIA NVS 130M
vs
MX450 30.5W 10Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Radeon Steam Deck 8CU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M G or Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.