GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs 8400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M G with GeForce RTX 2070 Super, including specs and performance data.

8400M G
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.26

RTX 2070 Super outperforms 8400M G by a whopping 17412% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking136977
Place by popularitynot in top-10095
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data40.20
Power efficiency1.8414.98
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82560
Core clock speed400 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors210 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200283.2
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400M G 0.26
RTX 2070 Super 45.53
+17412%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M G 105
RTX 2070 Super 18201
+17234%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1132
1440p-0−180
4K-0−152

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.78
1440pno data6.24
4Kno data9.60

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9300%
94
+9300%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−4600%
141
+4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8300%
84
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5700%
174
+5700%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−3500%
108
+3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2557%
186
+2557%
Valorant 24−27
−973%
279
+973%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2217%
270−280
+2217%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
Dota 2 9−10
−1422%
137
+1422%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5633%
172
+5633%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−2700%
84
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2257%
165
+2257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3520%
181
+3520%
Valorant 24−27
−938%
270
+938%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%
Dota 2 9−10
−1333%
129
+1333%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5000%
153
+5000%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−2167%
68
+2167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2100%
154
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1900%
100
+1900%
Valorant 24−27
−646%
194
+646%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−17400%
170−180
+17400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3167%
98
+3167%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 125
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 47
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8800%
85−90
+8800%
Fortnite 0−1 117
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−520%
93
+520%
Valorant 2−3
−12800%
258
+12800%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1700%
54
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3200%
66
+3200%
Fortnite 2−3
−2800%
58
+2800%
Counter-Strike 2 341
+0%
341
+0%
Battlefield 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Fortnite 218
+0%
218
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 193
+0%
193
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
Battlefield 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 168
+0%
168
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 263
+0%
263
+0%
Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%
Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 25
+0%
25
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is ahead in 30 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 45.53
Recency 9 May 2007 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 215 Watt

8400M G has 2050% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super, on the other hand, has a 17411.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M G is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3
22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
5323 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M G or GeForce RTX 2070 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.