Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs GeForce 8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1438not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG98GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 December 2007 (17 years ago)12 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69.78 $1,199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8256
Core clock speed540 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors210 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32015.20
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1792 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s89.86 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 December 2007 12 June 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1792 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 142 Watt

GeForce 8400 has 468% lower power consumption.

4000 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 600% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 and Quadro 4000 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 4000 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GeForce 8400
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 or Quadro 4000 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.