Radeon HD 8210E vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.89
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG80Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112128
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate28.002.400
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs204
TMUs288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount640 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 9 Watt

HD 8210E has an age advantage of 5 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 or Radeon HD 8210E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.