Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce 8400
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8400 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms 8400 by a whopping 4895% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1393 | 442 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 0.57 | no data |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Xe LPG (2023) |
GPU code name | G98 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 4 December 2007 (17 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.78 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 4 |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1950 MHz |
Number of transistors | 210 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 4.320 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 0.0208 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 4 | no data |
TMUs | 8 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR2 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12_2 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 0−1 | 25 |
Cost per frame, $
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50
+0%
|
50
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
Fortnite | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Fortnite | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Fortnite | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Valorant | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.20 | 9.99 |
Recency | 4 December 2007 | 14 December 2023 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 4895% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 8400 is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.