GRID K280Q vs GeForce 8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 with GRID K280Q, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 8400
2007, $70
256 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.19

K280Q outperforms 8400 by a whopping 3458% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1453595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.18
Power efficiency0.592.32
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG98GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 December 2007 (17 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69.78 $1,875

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81536
Core clock speed540 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors210 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32095.36
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache16 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.13.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 8400 0.19
GRID K280Q 6.76
+3458%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 8400 81
Samples: 50
GRID K280Q 2839
+3405%
Samples: 30

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 6.76
Recency 4 December 2007 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce 8400 has 800% lower power consumption.

GRID K280Q, on the other hand, has a 3457.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID K280Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K280Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GeForce 8400
NVIDIA GRID K280Q
GRID K280Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K280Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 or GRID K280Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.