GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs 8400 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 SE and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8400 SE
2008
128 MB DDR2, 50 Watt
0.15

4070 Ti SUPER outperforms 8400 SE by a whopping 47840% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.33
Power efficiency0.2420.32
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG86SAD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 August 2008 (17 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168448
Core clock speed459 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors210 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672689.0
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66
L1 Cacheno data8.3 MB
L2 Cache16 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400 SE 0.15
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 71.91
+47840%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400 SE 68
Samples: 6
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31797
+46660%
Samples: 7435

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1224
1440p-0−1147
4K-0−189

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.57
1440pno data5.44
4Kno data8.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 197
+0%
197
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+0%
196
+0%
Far Cry 5 203
+0%
203
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 172
+0%
172
+0%
Far Cry 5 197
+0%
197
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 196
+0%
196
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 430
+0%
430
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 188
+0%
188
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210
+0%
210
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Metro Exodus 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+0%
182
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 71.91
Recency 1 August 2008 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 285 Watt

8400 SE has 470% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 47840% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 SE in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4453 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 SE or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.