Radeon Sky 500 vs GeForce 8400 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 GS with Radeon Sky 500, including specs and performance data.

8400 GS
2007
256 MB DDR2, 40 Watt
0.37

Sky 500 outperforms 8400 GS by a whopping 2786% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1322456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.755.76
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG86Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
Core clock speed459 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate3.67276.00
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cache16 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mm242 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s154 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400 GS 0.37
Sky 500 10.68
+2786%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400 GS 164
Samples: 3140
Sky 500 4722
+2779%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 10.68
Recency 17 April 2007 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

8400 GS has 275% lower power consumption.

Sky 500, on the other hand, has a 2786.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Sky 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Sky 500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 8400 GS
AMD Radeon Sky 500
Radeon Sky 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 674 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS or Radeon Sky 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.