Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce 8400 GS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Ellesmere
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)24 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304 ×2
Core clock speed520 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors260 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.160179.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS5.728 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs8144 ×2
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s224.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 24 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

8400 GS PCI has 525% lower power consumption.

Pro Duo Polaris, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS PCI and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 651 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS PCI or Radeon Pro Duo Polaris, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.