GTX 1660 vs 830M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GeForce 830M
2.59

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 1065% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking779170
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Value for money0.5225.04
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN15?Turing TU116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years old)14 March 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219
Current price$160 $252 (1.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 has 4715% better value for money than GeForce 830M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561408
Core clock speed1029 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate18.40157.1
Floating-point performance588.8 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 830M and GeForce GTX 1660 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+no data
GameWorks+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 830M 2.59
GTX 1660 30.17
+1065%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 1065% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 830M 1005
GTX 1660 11692
+1063%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 1063% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 830M 6163
GTX 1660 71229
+1056%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 1056% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 830M 1961
GTX 1660 21131
+978%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 978% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 830M 1387
GTX 1660 14055
+914%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 914% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 830M 8105
GTX 1660 80889
+898%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 898% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce 830M 4371
GTX 1660 57413
+1213%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 1213% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GeForce 830M 4078
GTX 1660 55668
+1265%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 1265% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GeForce 830M 4342
GTX 1660 60172
+1286%

GTX 1660 outperforms 830M by 1286% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−438%
86
+438%
1440p4−5
−1100%
48
+1100%
4K2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1320%
71
+1320%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1780%
90−95
+1780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−833%
112
+833%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100
+3233%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3067%
95
+3067%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2100%
132
+2100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1950%
82
+1950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1117%
73
+1117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−933%
93
+933%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1780%
90−95
+1780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−608%
85
+608%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−840%
47
+840%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2967%
92
+2967%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1950%
123
+1950%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1700%
90
+1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1425%
61
+1425%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1325%
57
+1325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−567%
40
+567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−767%
78
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−1357%
102
+1357%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6500%
66
+6500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1780%
90−95
+1780%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40
+700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2767%
86
+2767%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2633%
82
+2633%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1533%
98
+1533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−850%
57
+850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1040%
57
+1040%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1040%
57
+1040%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−300%
40
+300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−700%
48
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7500%
76
+7500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1500%
32
+1500%
Hitman 3 3−4
−933%
31
+933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−37.5%
11
+37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10
Far Cry 5 4−5
−650%
30
+650%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−417%
31
+417%

This is how GeForce 830M and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1660 is 438% faster than GeForce 830M

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1660 is 1100% faster than GeForce 830M

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1660 is 1300% faster than GeForce 830M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 is 7700% faster than the GeForce 830M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 surpassed GeForce 830M in all 53 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.59 30.17
Recency 12 March 2014 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 120 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 830M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 830M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GeForce 830M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 100 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 830M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4595 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.