RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 8300

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8300 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 8300
2008
40 Watt
0.23

2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 8300 by a whopping 14643% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1416156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.4654.69
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC78AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163072
Core clock speed500 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistors210 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000203.0
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 8300 0.23
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 33.91
+14643%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 8300 101
Samples: 62
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 14993
+14745%
Samples: 1396

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 33.91
Recency 6 May 2008 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 8300 has 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14643.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8300 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8300
GeForce 8300
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 40 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.