Quadro FX 540 vs GeForce 8300

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8300 with Quadro FX 540, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 8300
2008
40 Watt
0.24
+26.3%

8300 outperforms FX 540 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14321468
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.460.59
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameC78NV43
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)9 August 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors210 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0002.400
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 8300 0.24
+26.3%
FX 540 0.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 8300 101
+26.3%
Samples: 62
FX 540 80
Samples: 27

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 0.19
Recency 6 May 2008 9 August 2004
Chip lithography 80 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce 8300 has a 26% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

FX 540, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 540 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 540 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro FX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 or Quadro FX 540, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.