Tesla X2070 vs GeForce 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1103not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.89no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF117GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 November 2013 (11 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed625 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors585 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0041.66
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1664
L1 Cache128 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 November 2013 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce 820M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2070, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 820M and Tesla X2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 820M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GeForce 820M
NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Tesla X2070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 934 votes

Rate GeForce 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 820M or Tesla X2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.