GeForce 256 DDR vs 820M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1035not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.84no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGF117NV10 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 November 2013 (11 years ago)23 December 1999 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed625 MHz120 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm220 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.000.48
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s4.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 November 2013 23 December 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 220 nm

GeForce 820M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 820M and GeForce 256 DDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 820M is a notebook card while GeForce 256 DDR is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GeForce 820M
NVIDIA GeForce 256 DDR
GeForce 256 DDR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 833 votes

Rate GeForce 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 204 votes

Rate GeForce 256 DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.