Radeon 610M vs GeForce 8200M G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8200M G and Radeon 610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8200M G
2008
0.17

610M outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 1582% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1423797
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Power efficiencyno data13.16
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLDragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8128
Core clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data17.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8200M G 0.17
Radeon 610M 2.86
+1582%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8200M G 65
Radeon 610M 1107
+1603%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−113
1440p3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Valorant 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−373%
50−55
+373%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14
+250%
Valorant 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−100%
8
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 2−3
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16
+0%
16
+0%
Metro Exodus 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Valorant 61
+0%
61
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

This is how 8200M G and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is 1933% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 610M is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is ahead in 31 test (54%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 2.86
Recency 3 June 2008 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm

Radeon 610M has a 1582.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 843 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G or Radeon 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.