GeForce Go 6100 vs 8200M G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8200M G and GeForce Go 6100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8200M G outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1488 | 1554 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| GPU code name | MCP77MV MCP79MVL | C51MV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 425 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 110 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | shared Memory |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | shared Memory |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+4.3%
|
21−24
−4.3%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+4.3%
|
21−24
−4.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+4.3%
|
21−24
−4.3%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the 8200M G is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 8200M G performs better in 16 tests (80%)
- there's a draw in 4 tests (20%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 110 nm |
8200M G has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce 8200M G is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
