RTX A4500 vs GeForce 8200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8200 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.


GeForce 8200
2008
40 Watt
0.39

RTX A4500 outperforms 8200 by a whopping 12836% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133769
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.7519.42
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC78GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)23 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores167168
Core clock speed500 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors210 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000369.6
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data7 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 8200 0.39
RTX A4500 50.45
+12836%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 8200 163
Samples: 174
RTX A4500 20728
+12617%
Samples: 527

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 50.45
Recency 6 May 2008 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 200 Watt

GeForce 8200 has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 12836% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8200 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 68 votes

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 215 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200 or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.