Radeon HD 8610G vs GeForce 810M

Place in performance ranking	1059	1045
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	0.03
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code name	GF117	Richland
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	24 March 2014 (10 years ago)	23 May 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price	$163	$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 8610G has 200% better value for money than GeForce 810M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	384
Core clock speed	738 MHz	533 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	626 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	5.904	no data
Floating-point performance	141.7 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 810M and Radeon HD 8610G compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Width	MXM Module	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 810M 1.04

HD 8610G 1.10
+5.8%

Radeon HD 8610G outperforms GeForce 810M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 810M 404

HD 8610G 425
+5.2%

Radeon HD 8610G outperforms GeForce 810M by 5% in Passmark.