Radeon HD 5470 vs GeForce 810M

Place in performance ranking	1057	1130
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.01	no data
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GF117	Cedar
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	24 March 2014 (10 years ago)	13 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$163	$73

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce 810M and ATI HD 5470 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	80
Core clock speed	738 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	585 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	19 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.904	5.200
Floating-point performance	141.7 gflops	104.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	170 mm
Width	MXM Module	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	no data	+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 810M 1.04
+50.7%

ATI HD 5470 0.69

GeForce 810M outperforms Radeon HD 5470 by 51% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 810M 404
+50.7%

ATI HD 5470 268

GeForce 810M outperforms Radeon HD 5470 by 51% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	1.04	0.69
Recency	24 March 2014	13 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	19 Watt