GeForce FX 5900 vs 810M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 810M with GeForce FX 5900, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 810M
2014
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.00
+1150%

810M outperforms FX 5900 by a whopping 1150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11551530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.13no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF117NV35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 March 2014 (11 years ago)12 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed738 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors585 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.9043.200
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs88
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data218 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s27.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 810M 1.00
+1150%
FX 5900 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 810M 419
+1132%
Samples: 98
FX 5900 34
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.00 0.08
Recency 24 March 2014 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

GeForce 810M has a 1150% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 810M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5900 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 810M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GeForce 810M
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 543 votes

Rate GeForce 810M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 55 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 810M or GeForce FX 5900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.