RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 810A

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 810A with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.


GeForce 810A
2014
2 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.57

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 810A by a whopping 2167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1005158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.0654.81
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK208AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923072
Core clock speed719 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors915 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate12.13203.0
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1696
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache32 KB3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.58.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 810A 1.57
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 35.59
+2167%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 810A 655
Samples: 13
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 14850
+2167%
Samples: 1846

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.57 35.59
Recency 22 July 2014 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 810A has 233% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2167% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 810A is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 15 votes

Rate GeForce 810A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 56 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 810A or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.