GeForce GTX 1660 vs 8100 + nForce 720a

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated231
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.22
Power efficiencyno data17.80
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC78TU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)14 March 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161408
Core clock speed500 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors210 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000157.1
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs888
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 14 March 2019
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 120 Watt

8100 + nForce 720a has 200% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a and GeForce GTX 1660. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 6239 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a or GeForce GTX 1660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.