GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs 8100 + nForce 720a

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameC78G98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168
Core clock speed500 MHz529 MHz
Number of transistors210 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0002.116
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared702 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.23 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 13 Watt

9200M GS GDDR3 has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 207.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a and GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a or GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.