Radeon HD 5570 vs GeForce 800M

Place in performance ranking	1021	998
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.02	0.02
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GF117	Redwood
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	17 March 2014 (10 years old)	9 February 2010 (14 years old)
Current price	$163	$149

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce 800M and ATI HD 5570 have a nearly equal value for money.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	400
Core clock speed	738 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	39 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.904	13.00
Floating-point performance	141.7 gflops	520.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	165 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	667 - 900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	25.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	2.0	no data
Optimus	+	no data
GameWorks	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 800M 1.18

ATI HD 5570 1.24
+5.1%

Radeon HD 5570 outperforms GeForce 800M by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 800M 457

ATI HD 5570 481
+5.3%

Radeon HD 5570 outperforms GeForce 800M by 5% in Passmark.