Tesla M40 vs GeForce 800A

Place in the ranking	1148	258
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.34	7.53
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	GF119	GM200
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	17 March 2014 (11 years ago)	10 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	3072
Core clock speed	475 MHz	948 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1112 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.800	213.5
Floating-point processing power	0.0912 TFLOPS	6.832 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	96
TMUs	8	192
L1 Cache	64 KB	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	128 KB	3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	5.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 800A 1.04

Tesla M40 24.44
+2250%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 800A 435
Samples: 8

Tesla M40 10219
+2249%

Samples: 20

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.04	24.44
Recency	17 March 2014	10 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt

GeForce 800A has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla M40, on the other hand, has a 2250% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 800A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 800A is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.