Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce 7950 GX2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7950 GX2 with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

7950 GX2
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 110 Watt
0.48

RX 7600M XT outperforms 7950 GX2 by a whopping 6929% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1278163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.3321.42
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameG71Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 June 2006 (19 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed500 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors278 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00 ×2316.0
Floating-point processing powerno data20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×264
TMUs24 ×2128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s ×2288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

7950 GX2 0.48
RX 7600M XT 33.74
+6929%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7950 GX2 201
RX 7600M XT 14137
+6933%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−11600%
117
+11600%
1440p0−160
4K-0−133

Cost per frame, $

1080p599.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 331
+0%
331
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+0%
116
+0%
God of War 130
+0%
130
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 245
+0%
245
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 192
+0%
192
+0%
God of War 118
+0%
118
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 237
+0%
237
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+0%
179
+0%
God of War 95
+0%
95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 186
+0%
186
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
God of War 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+0%
142
+0%
God of War 52
+0%
52
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
God of War 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how 7950 GX2 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 11600% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 33.74
Recency 5 June 2006 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 120 Watt

7950 GX2 has 9.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 6929.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7950 GX2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GX2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GX2
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 57 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 80 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7950 GX2 or Radeon RX 7600M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.