Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce 7950 GX2

Place in performance ranking	1188	204
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	23.49
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	G71	Navi 24
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 June 2006 (18 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$199
Current price	$252 (0.4x MSRP)	$274 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

7950 GX2 and RX 6500 XT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	1024
Core clock speed	500 MHz	2610 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2815 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	107 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.00	180.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	270 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	143.9 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

7950 GX2 0.52

RX 6500 XT 24.70
+4650%

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms GeForce 7950 GX2 by 4650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

7950 GX2 201

RX 6500 XT 9539
+4646%

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms GeForce 7950 GX2 by 4646% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −6000%	61 +6000%
1440p	0−1	32
4K	-0−1	17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

72
−4622%

3400−3450

+4622%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −4581%	2200−2250 +4581%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 −4606%	2400−2450 +4606%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −4591%	3800−3850 +4591%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −4600%	2350−2400 +4600%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −4622%	2550−2600 +4622%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −4637%	2700−2750 +4637%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −4592%	3050−3100 +4592%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −4620%	5050−5100 +4620%
Hitman 3	50−55 −4600%	2350−2400 +4600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	176 −4644%	8350−8400 +4644%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −4650%	3800−3850 +4650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −4597%	3100−3150 +4597%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	128 −4627%	6050−6100 +4627%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 −4630%	3500−3550 +4630%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −4581%	2200−2250 +4581%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 −4551%	2000−2050 +4551%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −4591%	3800−3850 +4591%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −4600%	2350−2400 +4600%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −4606%	1600−1650 +4606%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −4637%	2700−2750 +4637%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −4592%	3050−3100 +4592%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −4620%	5050−5100 +4620%
Hitman 3	23 −4465%	1050−1100 +4465%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −4645%	4650−4700 +4645%
Metro Exodus	45 −4567%	2100−2150 +4567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −4597%	3100−3150 +4597%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 −4620%	5050−5100 +4620%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	92 −4628%	4350−4400 +4628%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −4614%	3300−3350 +4614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −4581%	2200−2250 +4581%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 −4577%	1450−1500 +4577%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −4600%	2350−2400 +4600%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −4567%	1400−1450 +4567%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −4637%	2700−2750 +4637%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −4620%	5050−5100 +4620%
Horizon Zero Dawn	92 −4628%	4350−4400 +4628%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 −4599%	3900−3950 +4599%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 −4622%	2550−2600 +4622%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 −4500%	1150−1200 +4500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
−4597%

3100−3150

+4597%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −4581%	2200−2250 +4581%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −4612%	2450−2500 +4612%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −4515%	1200−1250 +4515%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 −4465%	1050−1100 +4465%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −4597%	1550−1600 +4597%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −4606%	800−850 +4606%
Far Cry 5	57 −4637%	2700−2750 +4637%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −4594%	2300−2350 +4594%
Hitman 3	27−30 −4555%	1350−1400 +4555%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 −4597%	3100−3150 +4597%
Metro Exodus	57 −4637%	2700−2750 +4637%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	56 −4632%	2650−2700 +4632%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −4567%	1400−1450 +4567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 −4637%	900−950 +4637%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
−4534%

1900−1950

+4534%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −4483%	1100−1150 +4483%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −4637%	900−950 +4637%
Hitman 3	10 −4400%	450−500 +4400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −4543%	1300−1350 +4543%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −4588%	750−800 +4588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −4543%	1300−1350 +4543%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −4567%	700−750 +4567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 −4567%	280−290 +4567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −4543%	650−700 +4543%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 −4650%	190−200 +4650%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −4543%	650−700 +4543%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −4606%	1600−1650 +4606%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 −4588%	1500−1550 +4588%
Metro Exodus	20 −4650%	950−1000 +4650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 −4400%	450−500 +4400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−4424%

950−1000
+4424%

This is how 7950 GX2 and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 6000% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.52	24.70
Recency	5 June 2006	19 January 2022
Cost	$599	$199
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	107 Watt