GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs 7900 GTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7900 GTX and GeForce RTX 2060 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

7900 GTX
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 84 Watt
1.01

RTX 2060 Super outperforms 7900 GTX by a whopping 4150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110689
Place by popularitynot in top-10015
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.60
Power efficiency0.8316.93
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG71TU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 March 2006 (18 years ago)9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2176
Core clock speed650 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors278 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60224.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

7900 GTX 1.01
RTX 2060 Super 42.93
+4150%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7900 GTX 387
RTX 2060 Super 16509
+4166%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%
1440p1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%
4K1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.38
1440pno data5.96
4Kno data9.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Elden Ring 121
+0%
121
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 228
+0%
228
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 202
+0%
202
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 156
+0%
156
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+0%
67
+0%
Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Elden Ring 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Fortnite 149
+0%
149
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 184
+0%
184
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 241
+0%
241
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 105
+0%
105
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Dota 2 185
+0%
185
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+0%
156
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 180
+0%
180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Elden Ring 78
+0%
78
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+0%
38
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+0%
114
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 114
+0%
114
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Elden Ring 34
+0%
34
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 138
+0%
138
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
+0%
83
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+0%
65
+0%
Valorant 59
+0%
59
+0%

This is how 7900 GTX and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Super is 5800% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 6600% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 4200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 42.93
Recency 9 March 2006 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 175 Watt

7900 GTX has 108.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Super, on the other hand, has a 4150.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GTX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX
GeForce 7900 GTX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 24 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13023 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.