GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs 7900 GT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7900 GT and GeForce RTX 2080 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

7900 GT
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 48 Watt
0.67

RTX 2080 Super outperforms 7900 GT by a whopping 7491% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.21
Power efficiency0.9614.04
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG71TU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 March 2006 (18 years ago)23 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed450 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1815 MHz
Number of transistors278 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80348.5
Floating-point processing powerno data11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s495.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

7900 GT 0.67
RTX 2080 Super 50.86
+7491%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7900 GT 258
RTX 2080 Super 19557
+7480%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−13900%
140
+13900%
1440p1−2
−9500%
96
+9500%
4K0−171

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.99
1440pno data7.28
4Kno data9.85

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Elden Ring 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 277
+0%
277
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 223
+0%
223
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 191
+0%
191
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Elden Ring 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Far Cry 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Fortnite 173
+0%
173
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 225
+0%
225
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 113
+0%
113
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 248
+0%
248
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 142
+0%
142
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 222
+0%
222
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 189
+0%
189
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 161
+0%
161
+0%
Valorant 217
+0%
217
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55
+0%
55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 163
+0%
163
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+0%
115
+0%
Metro Exodus 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 171
+0%
171
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+0%
115
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+0%
82
+0%
Valorant 87
+0%
87
+0%

This is how 7900 GT and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is 13900% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 9500% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 50.86
Recency 9 March 2006 23 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 250 Watt

7900 GT has 420.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super, on the other hand, has a 7491% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
GeForce 7900 GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 41 vote

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2576 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.