Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GeForce 7800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7800 GS 20Pipes AGP 7800 GS 24Pipes AGP 7800 GS AGP 7800 GT 7800 GT Dual 7800 GTX 7800 GTX 512
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7800 GT with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

7800 GT
2005, $449
256 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.58

T1200 Mobile outperforms 7800 GT by a whopping 2850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
7800 GT 7800 GT
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1263347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.6973.99
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG70TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date11 August 2005 (20 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed400 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors302 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00091.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2064
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length226 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5700%
58
+5700%
1440p1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
4K2−3
−3950%
81
+3950%

Cost per frame, $

1080p449.00no data
1440p449.00no data
4K224.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how 7800 GT and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 5700% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 3200% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 3950% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.58 17.11
Recency 11 August 2005 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 2850% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 261.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7800 GT is a desktop graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
GeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

7800 GT GeForce 7800 GT
vs
HD 8240 Radeon HD 8240
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
7800 GT GeForce 7800 GT
vs
ATI HD 4650 Radeon HD 4650
6800 XT 6800 XT
vs
R9 255 OEM R9 255 OEM
7800 GT 7800 GT
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4530 Mobility HD 4530
7800 GT 7800 GT
vs
ATI HD 2400 XT HD 2400 XT
7800 GT 7800 GT
vs
ATI 9250 9250
7800 GT 7800 GT
vs
ATI 9600 PRO 9600 PRO
7800 GT 7800 GT
vs
Radeon 780M 780M
7800 GTX 7800 GTX
vs
A10G A10G
6200 LE 6200 LE
vs
Quadro P620 P620
6200 LE 6200 LE
vs
A800 PCIe 80 GB A800 PCIe 80 GB
6200 LE 6200 LE
vs
Instinct MI355X Instinct MI355X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 71 votes

Rate GeForce 7800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 159 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7800 GT or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.