Radeon RX 6600 vs GeForce 7300 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7300 GT and Radeon RX 6600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

7300 GT
2006
128 MB DDR2, 24 Watt
0.35

RX 6600 outperforms 7300 GT by a whopping 11006% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1288118
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0166.37
Power efficiency1.0220.53
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG73Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 May 2006 (18 years ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149.99 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 has 663600% better value for money than 7300 GT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed350 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2491 MHz
Number of transistors177 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate2.800279.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.928 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs8112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

7300 GT 0.35
RX 6600 38.87
+11006%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7300 GT 138
RX 6600 15131
+10864%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1111
1440p0−156
4K-0−131

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data5.88
4Kno data10.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 225
+0%
225
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Metro Exodus 140
+0%
140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 68
+0%
68
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 182
+0%
182
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+0%
157
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+0%
64
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 29
+0%
29
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 38.87
Recency 15 May 2006 13 October 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 132 Watt

7300 GT has 450% lower power consumption.

RX 6600, on the other hand, has a 11005.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7300 GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
GeForce 7300 GT
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 181 vote

Rate GeForce 7300 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10289 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.