GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs 720A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking953not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.34no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGF117GB203
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 July 2014 (10 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9610752
Core clock speed775 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed938 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate15.01672.0
Floating-point processing power0.1801 TFLOPS43.01 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s1.01 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.110.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 175 Watt

GeForce 720A has 430.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 720A and GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 720A
GeForce 720A
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.