Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GeForce 7150M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7150M and Radeon RX Vega 9, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX Vega 9 outperforms 7150M by a whopping 11060% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1488 | 615 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.56 |
| Architecture | no data | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | C67 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) | 26 October 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 425 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | no data |
| Shared memory | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 18 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−1200%
|
12−14
+1200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−1200%
|
12−14
+1200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1100%
|
24−27
+1100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−233%
|
20−22
+233%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−163%
|
60−65
+163%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−1200%
|
12−14
+1200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−889%
|
85−90
+889%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−450%
|
40−45
+450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1100%
|
24−27
+1100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−233%
|
20−22
+233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−225%
|
13
+225%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−163%
|
60−65
+163%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−450%
|
40−45
+450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1100%
|
24−27
+1100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−233%
|
20−22
+233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−100%
|
8
+100%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−163%
|
60−65
+163%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 35−40 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−2500%
|
24−27
+2500%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 9 is 2500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 9 is ahead in 30 tests (49%)
- there's a draw in 31 test (51%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.05 | 5.58 |
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 26 October 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
RX Vega 9 has a 11060% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega 9 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
