RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 7150M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7150M with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 7150M by a whopping 136850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1484 | 40 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 26.92 |
Architecture | no data | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | C67 | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 7424 |
Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 425 MHz | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP) |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | shared Memory | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 12 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 16000 MHz |
Shared memory | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | shared Memory | 12 Ultimate |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−136567%
|
8200−8250
+136567%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−134900%
|
2700−2750
+134900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−136567%
|
8200−8250
+136567%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−134900%
|
2700−2750
+134900%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−135900%
|
6800−6850
+135900%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−136567%
|
4100−4150
+136567%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−136567%
|
8200−8250
+136567%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−134900%
|
2700−2750
+134900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−136567%
|
8200−8250
+136567%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−135900%
|
6800−6850
+135900%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−136150%
|
5450−5500
+136150%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−136567%
|
4100−4150
+136567%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−136150%
|
5450−5500
+136150%
|
World of Tanks | 8−9
−136775%
|
10950−11000
+136775%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−136567%
|
8200−8250
+136567%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−134900%
|
2700−2750
+134900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−136567%
|
8200−8250
+136567%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−135900%
|
6800−6850
+135900%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−136150%
|
5450−5500
+136150%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−136567%
|
4100−4150
+136567%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−136150%
|
5450−5500
+136150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−136567%
|
4100−4150
+136567%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−136150%
|
5450−5500
+136150%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
−136567%
|
20500−20550
+136567%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−136567%
|
20500−20550
+136567%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−136567%
|
20500−20550
+136567%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−134900%
|
2700−2750
+134900%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
−136567%
|
20500−20550
+136567%
|
Valorant | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.04 | 54.78 |
Recency | 1 February 2006 | 21 March 2023 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 136850% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 7150M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.