Quadro P3200 vs GeForce 7150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7150M with Quadro P3200, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 7150M
2006
0.04

P3200 outperforms 7150M by a whopping 51000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1531295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.76
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameC67GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores31792
Core clock speed1 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz1543 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data172.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.53 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1753 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 7150M 0.04
Quadro P3200 20.44
+51000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 7150M Samples: 149 18
Quadro P3200 Samples: 498 8564
+47478%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−184
4K-0−128

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4650%
95
+4650%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Valorant 24−27
−533%
150−160
+533%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2578%
240−250
+2578%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Dota 2 7−8
−1600%
119
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4300%
88
+4300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1580%
84
+1580%
Valorant 24−27
−533%
150−160
+533%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Dota 2 7−8
−1500%
112
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3500%
72
+3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Valorant 24−27
−533%
150−160
+533%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5100%
50−55
+5100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−153%
35−40
+153%
Valorant 1−2
−11900%
120−130
+11900%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 11900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 performs better in 24 tests (39%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (61%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 20.44
Recency 1 February 2006 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 16 nm

Quadro P3200 has a 51000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7150M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7150M
GeForce 7150M
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 30 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 330 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7150M or Quadro P3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.