Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce 710M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 710M with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 710M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.07

Pro W6600M outperforms 710M by a whopping 2437% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1133240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.5023.25
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 July 2013 (12 years ago)8 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921792
Core clock speed719 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors915 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate11.50227.8
Floating-point processing power0.2761 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache32 KB512 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 710M 1.07
Pro W6600M 27.15
+2437%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 710M 448
Samples: 1012
Pro W6600M 11407
+2446%
Samples: 11

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Fortnite 2−3
−6450%
130−140
+6450%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Valorant 30−35
−469%
180−190
+469%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 100−110
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−938%
270−280
+938%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Dota 2 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Fortnite 2−3
−6450%
130−140
+6450%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6200%
60−65
+6200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1129%
85−90
+1129%
Valorant 30−35
−469%
180−190
+469%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Dota 2 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1129%
85−90
+1129%
Valorant 30−35
−469%
180−190
+469%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−6450%
130−140
+6450%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−2686%
190−200
+2686%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 1−2
−21800%
210−220
+21800%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 27−30
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6300%
60−65
+6300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2200%
45−50
+2200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3300%
65−70
+3300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Valorant 5−6
−3220%
160−170
+3220%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 85−90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 21800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M performs better in 43 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 27.15
Recency 24 July 2013 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 90 Watt

GeForce 710M has 500% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 2437.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 710M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 710M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GeForce 710M
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 784 votes

Rate GeForce 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 710M or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.