NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
Value for money (0-100)
Terascale 2
GPU code name
Thames-Pro / XT
Market segment
Launch date
1 April 2013 (8 years ago)
7 January 2012 (9 years ago)
Price now

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
Core clock speed
775 MHz
450 MHz
Boost clock speed
800 MHz
650 MHz
Number of transistors
915 million
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt
13 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
297.6 gflops
480.0 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce 710M and Radeon HD 7570M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
no data
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
no data


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Standard memory configuration
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
3200 / 1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
25.6 GB/s
Shared memory

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 2560x1600
no data
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
no data
VGA аnalog display support
Up to 2048x1536
no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 2560x1600
no data
HDCP content protection
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming


Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 API
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 710M 1.67
HD 7570M 1.68 +0.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 710M 5323 +15.1%
HD 7570M 4623

3DMark Fire Strike Score

GeForce 710M 726 +29.2%
HD 7570M 562

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 710M 769 +35.1%
HD 7570M 569

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 710M 1107 +33.5%
HD 7570M 829

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 710M 4641 +24.5%
HD 7570M 3727


This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 710M 442
HD 7570M 445 +0.7%

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 −0.1%
4546 +0.1%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 −0.1%
4546 +0.1%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce 710M and Radeon HD 7570M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
20 Mh/s −90%
38 Mh/s +90%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Both graphics cards satisfy the 63% minimum and 55% recommended requirements of all games known to us.


Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

GeForce 710M
HD 7570M
no data
no data

Competitors of GeForce 710M from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 710M from AMD is Radeon HD 8350G, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 710M:

Competitors of Radeon HD 7570M from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 7570M from NVIDIA is GeForce 710M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 4 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 7570M:

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 710M

Much newer (1 April 2013 vs 7 January 2012)

Cheaper ($44 vs $712)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 7570M

0.6% better performance in benchmarks

More pipelines (400 vs 96)

Higher memory bandwidth (25.6 vs 14.4 GB/s)

Lower power consumption (13W vs 15W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce 710M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 710M
AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.