Quadro RTX 8000 vs GeForce 710M

Place in performance ranking	1018	53
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.26	9.65
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N14M-GL	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$9,999
Current price	$44	$3230 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 8000 has 3612% better value for money than GeForce 710M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	4608
Core clock speed	775 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.50	509.8
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 710M and Quadro RTX 8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Standard memory configuration	DDR3	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 2560x1600	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 2560x1600	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP content protection	+	no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 710M 1.19

RTX 8000 50.01
+4103%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms GeForce 710M by 4103% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 710M 460

RTX 8000 19370
+4111%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms GeForce 710M by 4111% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce 710M 2457

RTX 8000 136722
+5465%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms GeForce 710M by 5465% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−3900%

160−170

+3900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −3789%	350−400 +3789%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4043%	290−300 +4043%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −3789%	350−400 +3789%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4043%	290−300 +4043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3650%	300−310 +3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3900%	80−85 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −3900%	80−85 +3900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −4043%	290−300 +4043%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.19	50.01
Recency	1 April 2013	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	260 Watt